![]() ![]() The only issue that you need to focus on going forward is that you must devote time to supervising your staff. You have served as a prime example of how to handle problems with tact and discretion. You have managed to clean our books smoothly, sometimes under challenging circumstances. “Even though you joined us recently, your performance as the chief accountant has been commendable. I believe if you address the two points, the paper will be acceptable for publication in this journal.” Example 5: I do not think that either is very helpfulĢ) Add a section on how your method might be used for clustering.Īpart from those two issues, the rest of the paper is reasonably straightforward. However, I have a couple of suggestions for improving the paper:ġ) Please rewrite the last parts of the introduction and eliminate the current history section. “The writing is clear, the figures are helpful, and the discussion includes some interesting ideas. Attend social functions, have lunch in the department lounge regularly, and attend faculty meetings more often.” Example 4: My recommendation is that you build personal relationships with the faculty. ![]() I think this is primarily due to your being rather introverted. You have not had much interaction with the department. There is only one issue that I would like to bring up before you are granted tenure. And you are a good person, an important consideration for this small department. You are also an excellent manager–attentive to details yet willing to take the initiative when necessary. As the head of an important department, you are clearly hard-working, intelligent, and creative. I enjoyed very much working with you on this project. “Your department has my highest praise for its support of economics research. The manuscript needs a thorough revision before it is considered for publication.” ![]() In general, the author does not provide enough information for the reader to understand the research data. Also, I found it difficult to follow most of the physiology section without a notation system for transport processes across membranes. One example is in the section on ‘The sensory and motor functions of the stomach.’ I could not understand how some of the mechanisms discussed are related to motor function. However, several parts of the manuscript lack sufficient detail and clarity. The author presents the material in an organized fashion, and the figures are well-chosen. “The writing is clear and straightforward. Otherwise, I found the manuscript very well organized and clearly written.” Example 2: The said books should be directly relevant to the topics discussed. You may consider including an explicit citation of at least two recent English-language books. The only thing I would like to see changed in the final version is the citation. I strongly recommend it for publication in the journal. I believe that this manuscript will be of genuine interest to all members of the broad community, including researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. The manuscript is easy to follow and provides a valuable state-of-the-art picture of the area. The literature review is thorough, and the authors have succeeded in covering most of the relevant material. “The manuscript presents a well-written, comprehensive overview of the topic. The following are 10 examples of reviews that demonstrate the quality and depth of a peer review. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |